I found it surprising that it mentioned allowing for failure. It's really important to do, but not something I was actively thinking about implementing into a company structure.
It's confusing to me that some entrepreneurs would want to stop innovation with in their venture. I find the idea that I facilitated a way for someone else to be innovative to be really rewarding.
From the reading it sounds like business need to regularly redefine themselves, to some degree, in order to not decline. Is this true? I would of also liked to see how company structure and culture are more related. I think both reflect and influences the other, and it's important to craft each in order to positively benefit the other.
I completely agreed with the main points of keeping the company innovative and dynamic at all levels, in order to increase ability to innovate. It seems especially important given the rapid changes in the technology sector now a days.
No comments:
Post a Comment